Guinea

Screening process
For Cat A and Cat B projects, the proponent submits, to the MEDD and to the AGEE, a request to realise a detailed or simplified ESIA, respectively.

Contents of the starting document
The request must be accompanied by the ToR for the ESIA. The ToR should refer to the conclusions of any SEAs that are relevant to the project.

For any project, the request must contain a description of the project, its location, expected impacts (positive and negative), project budget and a time line for its realisation.

The documentation must contain maps, plans, sketches and other documents that help to better situate the project in its context.

Timeline Screening
Within 5 working days, the AGEE performes te screening and proposes a categorisation to the MEDD. The MEDD then informes the proponent within 7 working days of this decision.

Scoping process
The proponent develops Terms of Reference for the ESIA and submits them to the MEDD, who transfers them to the AGEE for scoping and evaluation of the document. The evaluation may include a visit to the proposed site and a limited public consultation, both at the cost of the proponent.

Contents of the scoping document
Not specified, except for the above.

Timeline scoping
Within 14 days after receiving the ToR, the AGEE starts the scoping and evaluation of the ToR, in order to advise the MEDD on its quality.

The MEDD informs the proponent of its appraisal within 7 days after receiving the AGEE’s advice. In its communication, the MEDD details the nature and scope of the ESIA the proponent must prepare.

Note: The ToR may indicate a reasonable timeline for the ESIA to be submitted to the MEDD. If not respected, the MEDD may ask for an actualisation of the ToR.

Assessment process
The proponent is responsible for the realisation of the ESIA, in line with the vaidated ToR.

Contents of the ESIA report
The minimum content requirement for a detailed ESIA is:

• A non technical summary;
• An introduction;
• A project description;
• An analysis of the current situation of the site and its surroundings;
• A description of the legal, political and institutional context of the projet;
• A description of the alternatives;
• A planning of adaptation and resilience to climate change and on migratory species and their habitats;
• Impacts on gender and vulnerable persons;
• Evaluation of risks and environmental and social impacts in the different project phases;
• Identification and description of measures;
• Results of public consultations;
• A complaints mechanism;
• An Environmental and social management plan;
• An environmental urgencies management plan;
• A general conclusion;

The arrêté contains more details on each content element.

Note 1: Any project that involves involuntary resettlement (physical, economical, restricted access) must develop a resettlement action plan (PAR) when over 200 people are affected, a succinct resettlement plan when 50-199 people are affected, or propose a functional framework in case of restricted access. With less than 50 people affected, the measures to manage the resettlement must be integrated in the ESIA report (article 24).

Note 2: content requirements for simplified ESIA are not detailed here but are provided in article 26 of the same arrêté.

Note 3: the ESIA report and related documents must be prepared in French and in 29 copies (23 for the CTAE, 1 for the MEDD, 2 for the AGEAA, 2 for the Prefecture, 1 for the sector ministry). (article 47).

Accreditation of consultants
The proponent may engage a consultant to realise the ESIA. The consultant must be approved by the MEDD. If the consultant is not of Guinean nationality, he/she must engage a Guinean consultant. Both must be approved by the Ministry.

Review process
The ESIA report is submitted to the MEDD for review. An actualisation may be required before analysis and validation.

AGEE carries out the review, possibly with the CTAE (see below).

The review starts with an assessment whether the ESIA report is fit for review, on the basis of the respect of the ToR, a verification mission and a public consultation carried out by the AGEE.

Review expertise
For category A and B projects, the MEDD establishes a Technical Commission for Environmental Analysis (CTAE). The composition of the CTAE depends on the project and includes government and civil society representatives. The validation session is held at central level but can also be held in a zone or region.

Timeline Review
The analysis by AGEE is done within 30 days upon receiving the ESIA report. This period does not include time taken by the proponent to reply to comments and supply additional information, nor the time needed to make necessary budget available for the remainder of the process.

Costs related to the verification mission, public consultation, CTAE’s work etc are at the proponent’s charge and should be intregrally paid to the AGEE before the review work commences.

Integration of ESIA into decision-making
A ‘cahier de charges environnementales et sociale (CCES)’ and a protocole to support the AGEE in the follow up on the execution of the CCES are prepared and signed by the proponent before the issuing of the environmental clearance.

Cat A projects: Environmental Compliance Certificate (CCE), valid for one year and renewable by the MEDD. The CCE becomes invalid if the project has not started within two years of its issuance.

Cat B projects: environmental authorisation (AE) valid for one year and renewable by the MEDD.

Cat C projects: Avis de Conformité Environnementale (ACE), valid for one year and renewable by the AGEE.

Renewal is done annually after submission of the ESMP for cat A and B projects, or CCES for cat C projects.

| Source information Article 22, Arrêté A/2022/1646/MEDD/CAB/SGG portant procédure administrative d’évaluations environnementales.

Decision justification
If the ESIA report does not satisfactorily treat issues raised in the ToR or does not integrate the observations and concerns raised by the CTAE or the AGEE, the MEDD informs the proponent accordinlgy and indicates how these issues can be remedied.

The amended report is submitted directly to the AGEE and the sector ministry for review. If the MEDD does not find the response satisfactory, it may inform the proponent accordingly. This puts an end to the ESIA procedure.

Timeline decision-making
After receiving the final ESIA report, the MEDD has 7 days to take a final decision.

Compliance monitoring
The ESMP becomes part of the proponent’s CCES. The proponent periodically submits progress reports to the AGEE and the sector ministry (every 6 months). They both monitor compliance. AGEE is assisted by Comités Préfectoraux de Suivi Environnemental et Social (CPSES)

Non-compliance penalties
In case of non compliance with the ESMP, the CCE is suspended. In case of repetition, the CCE is withdrawn.

Public participation requirements for ESIA process stages

1. Information and awareness raising of populations affected by the project, on the fact that the studies for a potential project will take place;
2. Public consultation notably of Project Affected People (PAP), as well as the general public, during the elaboration of the ESIA report. Tools used for this consultations must be validated beforehand by the stakeholders;
3. Distribution of the ESIA report among consulted target groups, for amendments and appropriation;
4. Acess through any means by AGEE and its representatives at appropriate local levels;
5. Consultation of the population by all possible means on the content of the REE (ESIA report)

Access to information
The draft ESIA report and the final ESIA report are made public by the AGEE through publication on its website. A national register for EA reports will be created to this end.