Egypt

Legislation at project level

Environmental Assessment has been firmly in place in Egypt since the late nineties. Institutional, administrative and regulatory details for ESIA are comprehensive, and a range of sectoral ESIA guidelines is available. The Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) oversees the ESIA system,  but sectoral ministries and governing bodies are the competent administrative authorities for ESIA. There are no formal provisions for SEA.



ECA, 2005, Review of the Application of Environmental Impact Assessment in Selected African Countries

Overview ESIA procedure

The ESIA procedure is dependent on the classification of the project in category A, B or C, ranging from little to adverse environmental impact.

  • Category A projects need to provide information on environmental effects and how to mitigate those effects. This information cannot be defined as an EIA report.
  • Category B and C project result in an EIA report that is more extensive in case of the latter category.

Procedure

  1. The proponent submits a letter of intent to undertake the activity to the CAA. This application should be accompanied by form A in case of Category A projects, form B for Category B projects and a full ESIA report in case of Category C projects.
  2. The CAA sends the application to the EEAA for review and advice on approval including conditions.
  • For Category A and B projects, the screening decision is  combined with the project approval decision. Category A can be rejected, but not on the basis of environmental reasons only. Category B projects may be rejected, approved with conditions or requested to proceed with a full EIA.
  • As Category C projects are required to submit a full ESIA report at this early stage, screening is effectively done by the proponent. The CAA and EEAA then proceed to review the EIA report on its quality.

Scoping is not a obligatory stage in the ESIA procedure.



EIA guidelines, 2009

Click on a process step to learn more

Screening


Screening process
Screening is a legally required step. Four categories of projects are distinguished:

  1. Category A: project with minimum environmental impacts;
  2. Category B: project with potential adverse environmental impacts;
  3. Category C: Projects with highly adverse impacts.
  4. List of projects that have special conditions but do not require ESIA.

The Competent Administrative Authority (CAA) receives the application documents and officially notifies the proponent about the screening decision.

Special cases
Some projects need to be classified differently, these include:

  • Projects in areas that are environmentally sensitive;
  • Projects for which an Integrated or Strategic/ Regional ESIA has been prepared;
  • Expansion of existing facilities / project.
EIA guidelines, 2009.


Contents of the starting document

The application document (screening form A) for Category A projects need to contain information on:

  • The location of the project;
  • Description of the area where the project is proposed;
  • Products and by-products, types of power supply, raw materials used and source of water (public, groundwater, surface water), wastes resulting from the activity;
  • Projects starting dates for construction and operation;
  • Gaseous emissions, dust, temperature conditions and methods of control;
  • Methods of protection and control of noise; and
  • Description of any other mitigation measure.

For Category B projects (screening form B) require more information. In addition to the above:

  • A more detailed description of the area of the project, including available infrastructure;
  • Methods of discharge of waste; and
  • A preliminary analysis of environmental impact during operation and methods or mitigation, covering:

a) impacts on the air quality
b) impacts on quality and availability of water
c) impacts on soil quality and fertility
d) visiual impacts
e) noise impacts
f) other significant impacts
g) description of other measures
h) measures undertaken to protect the health and safety of workers and fire prevention facilities.

For Category C projects a screening form does not exist.

EIA guidelines, 2009.


Timeline Screening

The EEAA reviews the application of all three categories of projects within 30 days. There is however no information on the maximum number of days for the CAA to process the application documents to the EEAA and communicate the outcome of the screening decision.

EIA guidelines, 2009.

Scoping


Scoping process
A formal scoping phase resulting in a scoping decision does not exist.

  • For category B, EEAA might develop the ToR if a scoped EIA study is required.
  • For category C, the Proponent conducts scoping by making use of sector guidelines.
EIA guidelines, 2009.

Assessment


Assessment process
Category B and C projects need to cover environmental, economic, technical as well as landuse and socio-culture aspects.

  • Methods for the assessment are not prescribed;
  • Only for category C projects the proponent has to consult stakeholders;
  • Only for category C projects the proponent has to develop and compare alternatives.
EIA guidelines, 2009.

 

Contents of the ESIA report
Only for category C projects a table of contents for the ESIA study is provided:

  • Executive summary;
  • Policy, legal and administrative framework;
  • Description of the proposed project;
  • Description of the environment;
  • Significant environmental impacts;
  • Analysis of alternatives;
  • Environmental management plan (incl. monitoring programm, description of mitigation measures);
  • Publich consultation;
  • List of references;
  • Appendices: list of environmental assessment prepares; records of attendees in public consultation meetings, agenda of public consultation meetings.

Review


Review process
The CAA or the licensing body receives the EIA report (category B and C projects) and registers and executes an administrative compliance check. After a positive check, CAA sends the EIA report to EEAA for the technical review.
The EEAA submits its advice to the CAA or the licensing authority and the CAA communicates it to the proponent.

 

EIA guidelines, 2009.


Review expertise

EEAA uses internal reviewers and independent consultants for the review process from the Egyption universities and research centres.

In case of a complex project, an independent review committee can be established.

EIA guidelines, 2009.

 

Timeline Review
The EEAA has 30 days to evaluate whether the project was correctly classified and review the quality of the EIA report.

The outcome can be the following:

  • Approval of the ESIA study/form, while indicating the environmental requirements with which the project proponent should comply;
  • Objection of the ESIA and a recommendation to refuse the project. Reasons for objection usually are related to environmental impacts of the project and the maximum carrying capacity for pollution in the project area.
EIA guidelines, 2009.

Decision-making


Integration of ESIA into decision-making
The CAA’s are responsible for project approval.

Based upon the review of the EIA report the EEAA decides on environmentally acceptability of the project. EEAA formulates conditions for project license to be approved by the CAA.

EIA guidelines, 2009.


Timeline decision-making

No information

Possibilities for appeal
The proponent can appeal the EIA approval decision by the EEAA. The proponent should make an objection within 30 days to the Permanent Appeal Committee. This commmittee consists of a representative form the EEAA, the proponent or attorney, a representative of the licensing body, three experts selected as members for three years.

Law no 4. (1994) and executive regulations of law no. 4

Follow-up


Compliance monitoring
For category B and C projects an Environmental Management Plan needs to be part of the ESIA study consisting of:

  • Summary of environmental aspects and impacts;
  • Mitigation measures;
  • Self-monitoring plan;
  • Institutional arrangements.

Before the CAA grant the operation license, they review the requirements that the facility should abide to and undertake a field visit to check the compliance with the EIA approval conditions.

The EEAA is mandated to follow up entries in the register kept by the proponent to ensure that it conforms to the facts, to take samples as required and to conduct appropriate tests to determine the impact of the activities on the environment and the extent of its compliance with the conditions.

EIA guidelines, 2009.


Non-compliance penalties

In case of violation of the environmental conditions the EEAA notifies the CAA to direct the owner of the establishment to rectify the violations. If the owner fails to comply within 60 days EEAA is entitled, in agreement with the CAA, to take legal and judicial procedures, such as halting the violating activity until compliance is ensured again.

EIA guidelines, 2009.

Stakeholder engagement


Public participation requirements for ESIA process stages
Public consultation is only mandatory for category C projects. Consultation has to be undertaken during the scoping phase and after the preparation of the draft ESIA.

The proponent needs to prepare a public consultation plan before the start of consultation. The proponent will meet EEAA to discuss this plan.

During the scoping phase either individual meetings or unified meetings can be organised. The stakeholder are informed about the project and the aspects to be addressed in the study. Results are discussed with EEAA and taken into account for defining the content of the assessment.

Public participation during the review phase takes place as a hearing session which involves representatives of all concerned parties. The participants will receive an executive summary of the study 15 days before the session. During the meeting, the results of the study and the mitigation measures are presented. A discussion follows where objections can be made regarding the presented mitigation measures.

The EIA report has a separate chapter on public participation. It should include:

  • The methodologies used;
  • The analysis of the data;
  • Methodologies of the proponent to ensure the continuity of the consultation process during the construction and operation phases;
  • Commitments of the project owner to improve the surrounding environment and support the neighbouring communities.

Also documentation of the public meetings have to be attached to the ESIA report.

EIA guidelines, 2009.

 

Timeline for public comments
Not specified

Access to information
For category B and C projects the EIA report will be published on the website of EEAA.

EIA guidelines, 2009.